Monday, February 8, 2016

Drop in prostate cancer screening reveals split among doctors – Reuters

n”>(Reuters Health) – – After U.S. guidelines advised versus timetable tests, declines in prostate cancer screening have actually been sharper among primary care doctors compared to urologists, according to a brand-new study that suggests the medical community remains divided over the very best means to seek these tumors.

In late 2011, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a government-backed panel of independent physicians, recommended versus timetable prostate cancer examinations for every one of men. They cited comes to that widespread screening regularly caught harmless tumors that didn’t demand treatment and led to unnecessary procedures along with adverse effects adore impotence and incontinence.

The next year, testing rates for prostate cancer among men aged 50 to 74 years old dropped to concerning 16 percent among primary care physicians, from about 37 percent in 2010 prior to brand-new guidelines took effect.

But among urologists, usage of the test for a substance in the blood called prostate-personal antigen (PSA) decreased just concerning 4 percentage points to concerning 35 percent over the exact same period, researchers report in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“There is considerably evidence that men along with limited life expectancy do not reward from PSA testing, and I believe experts can easily agree on that,” said senior study author Dr. Quoc-Dien Trinh, a urologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

“The rest is a matter of opinions and expert panels,” Trinh added by email. “I do feel strongly that some men are much more at risk of prostate cancer and I’m concerned concerning just what will certainly happen to these men provided the most recent USPSTF advice and trends in PSA testing.”

Both the American Cancer Society and the American Urological Association recommend that men discuss the incentives and harms of screening along with doctors to make a joint decision. Among various other things, patients need to think of that black men and those along with a family history of prostate cancer are at better risk.

To see whether the sort of physician patients see influences screening, Trinh and colleagues analyzed nationally representative survey data on 64 men that went to urologists for preventive care visits and 1,100 that checked out primary care physicians. None had a history of tumors or various other prostate problems.

The sample represents roughly 800,000 visits to urologists and 26 million visits to primary care doctors, nationwide, in 2010 and 2012.

One restriction of the study is that researchers relied on orders for PSA screening, which may not accurately reflect exactly how numerous examinations were performed, the authors note. They were additionally unable to see test outcomes to assess exactly how various doctors could have actually defined raised PSA levels.

Even so, the differences in screening rates and modifications in PSA testing in the future most likely reflect opposing perceptions among physicians concerning the reward of screening also as the conflicting guidelines, researchers conclude in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Recent decreases in screening have actually been associated along with some decline in the detection of early-stage prostate cancer, diary editor Dr. Rita Redberg of the University of California San Francisco noted in an accompanying editorial.

It will certainly take considerably longer, however, to know exactly how this impacts the variety of men diagnosed along with advanced tumors and prostate cancer deaths, noted Redberg.

The limited lose in PSA testing by urologists probably reflects a belief among specialists that they’re performing what’s finest for patients, also as a payment system that benefits much more screening, not less, Redberg added by email.

Urologists could additionally see much more patients that want aggressive treatment, while primary care physicians could see much more older, sicker men that aren’t excellent candidates for screening, said Dr. Alexander Kutikov, a urologic oncology specialist at Fox Hunt Cancer Focus in Philadelphia that wasn’t involved in the study.

“Regardless of just what specialist a patient approaches to discuss PSA screening, patients need to know that decisions concerning screening are exceedingly personal,” Kutikov said by email.

Though many men will certainly die along with and not of prostate cancer, some doctors and patients could still hesitate to forgo screening since the health problem is curable just as quickly as it’s caught prior to it spreads, Kutikov added.

“just what is the right decision for one individual could not be right for another,” Kutikov said.

SOURCE: bit.ly/IZGqPC JAMA Internal Medicine, online February 8, 2016.

0 comments

Post a Comment